STATES

Eighteen states.
Twenty-four programs.
Every one of them, by name.

An education savings account program puts money into an account a parent controls. Eighteen states run one. This is where they are, what they are called, who qualifies, and where the money comes from.

Figures read October 1 to 3, 2026.

18states with a program
24programs across them
11states that publish a current award amount

What counts as one of these programs.

A count only means something next to the definition behind it, so here is the one this page uses.

A program is on this list if all of the following are true. Money is held in an account for a named student and the parent directs it. The account pays for more than one kind of expense. It is run by a state agency, or by a private organization under state contract or statutory authority. And it is making a new award for the 2026-27 school year.

That last condition does real work. Two accounts that exist in law are not on the list because neither is making a new award this year, and a company deciding where to put its effort wants programs that are growing. Both are named further down.

That test puts twenty-four programs in eighteen states.

Notice what the test does not ask: where the money came from before it reached the account. Four of the twenty-four are funded by donations that earn the donor a state tax credit rather than by an appropriation: the Florida Tax Credit Scholarship, the Personalized Education Program that runs under it, Missouri MOScholars, and Utah Carson Smith Opportunity. A family spends them the same way. A company registers with the same administrator and is paid through the same platform. So they are counted.

The test does do work at the edges. A voucher pays tuition at a school: one category of expense, and the family's choice is which school. Most tax credit scholarships work the same way, which is why there are dozens of them and only four here. Neither is on this list.

Trackers count this differently. EdChoice lists twenty-one programs in eighteen states, counting by where the money comes from, and keeps a separate tax credit category. Its twenty-one are these twenty-four, minus the four above, plus Montana, which it still counts.

Its separate category is not those same four, which is worth saying because the two lists look like they should line up and do not. EdChoice's tax credit page states in words that there are three such programs, in Florida, Missouri, and Utah, and then displays four, the fourth being New Hampshire's Education Tax Credit, a program this page does not count at all because its statute creates no individual account. Florida's Personalized Education Program is not listed there separately. So the counts reconcile and the categories do not.

One more choice sits underneath the number, and this page makes it rather than leaving it implicit. Florida's Personalized Education Program runs under the Florida Tax Credit statute, and it has its own handbook, its own eligibility, and its own application. Counted by statute it is part of one program. Counted by handbook it is a program of its own. This page counts by handbook, because the handbook governs what a family may buy and what a provider has to do, and that is the thing this page is for. Counting Florida by statute instead would give twenty-three.

Where the money comes from.

Five shapes, and the shape tells you what caps the program.

Seventeen of the twenty-four are funded by a state appropriation. The money is a budget line a legislature sets, and what the program can pay out in a year is whatever that line holds.

Tennessee's Education Savings Account pilot and its Individualized Education Account program draw state and local dollars through TISA, the state's school funding formula, so the award moves when the formula's base amount moves.

Alabama's CHOOSE Act is a refundable state income tax credit deposited into the account. It is state money going to the family rather than a donation, and the statute fixes the amount.

Mississippi's award is calculated each spring against the Mississippi Student Funding Formula and depends on what has been appropriated, which is why eligible applicants are waitlisted when the money runs out.

Four draw on donations that earn the donor a state tax credit: the Florida Tax Credit Scholarship and its Personalized Education Program, Missouri MOScholars, and Utah Carson Smith Opportunity. What caps a donation stream is not a budget line but what gets raised in a year, which makes the volume harder to predict even though the account works the same way.

Two of those four are not purely donation funded. Utah's Carson Smith Opportunity names three sources, including an appropriation from the state. Missouri's records describe a credit mechanism while a court order records a general revenue appropriation into the same fund. Both entries say so.

An appropriation can be spent out. A formula-linked award changes when the formula changes. A credit drawn against tax revenue has a statutory ceiling instead of an appropriation. None of that changes what the account buys. All of it changes how much is there to buy with.

Where there is no number, that is the finding.

Eleven of the eighteen publish a current award amount for 2026-27: Alabama, Florida, Iowa, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming.

Three publish one their own documents qualify. Indiana labels its table an estimate. Georgia's family handbook says this year's amount will be shared once it is finalized while its program site states $6,500. Louisiana's figures are still labeled 2025-26 on the state's own page.

Four publish none. Arizona has no 2026-27 table. Arkansas has no figure for this year. Missouri publishes its award as a percentage of a state adequacy target it does not publish. New Hampshire publishes a formula, and its rate table did not return.

Within Tennessee, two of the three programs publish an amount and the Individualized Education Account does not. Within Florida, all four draw on one published table.

Where a state publishes nothing, the figure quoted above it comes from EdChoice, and it is a different kind of fact: an average of what accounts actually held, not what an award pays. Every page in EdChoice's education savings account set carries one date, December 16, 2025, whatever year the individual figures are labeled. That applies to Arizona, Arkansas, Missouri, and Tennessee's Individualized Education Account.

Four things recur as gaps: how many providers are approved, what a program actually spent against its appropriation, how long a payment takes from submission to deposit, and what the money was spent on by category. No state in this review published all four, and most published none, though that is what this review found rather than the result of a systematic audit of every program.

Provider counts are published in places and are easy to misread. EdChoice gives a figure it labels providers or schools for three programs: Arkansas 166, South Carolina 541, and Tennessee's Individualized Education Account 53. Arkansas's own annual report separates 166 participating private schools from 2,132 service providers, so the two are not the same count.

Where a state's own documents disagree.

Arkansas states three different amounts for 2025-26 across three of its own documents: $6,864, $6,994, and approximately $6,800.

Indiana's FAQ caps a sibling's award at up to $8,000, which is below the $8,328.56 top of the Department's own award table.

New Hampshire's eligibility is sometimes still described as capped at 350 percent of the federal poverty level. It is not. RSA 194-F:1 defines an eligible student as a resident of the state who is eligible to enroll in a public elementary or secondary school, with no income test, and puts the 350 percent figure in the priority guidelines instead. The source note records the amendment at 2025, 75:1, 2, effective June 10, 2025. State materials written before that date may still show the old rule.

Louisiana's FAQ describes the top disability tier as 145 percent of the base award. 145 percent of the published $5,243 base is $7,602.35, and the published tier is $7,627. The displayed base is rounded and the formula may run on unrounded inputs, so this is a mismatch between what is published and what the published figures reproduce, rather than a demonstrated error in the calculation.

Florida's two scholarship funding organizations publish the same 2026-27 figures under opposite grade band headings, so one dollar amount is labeled K-3 on one table and 4-8 on the other. Both tables are linked here so the swap can be checked side by side.

Arizona's statute sets the award against what the student would have generated at a charter school. Its parent handbook describes it as what the state would have spent had the student attended the local public school.

Florida's statute puts the Unique Abilities enrollment cap at 72,615 for 2024-25, rising each year by five percent of exceptional student education full-time enrollment. The Department's FAQ says approximately 70,000 and three percent.

Georgia's family handbook and its program site disagree on whether this year's amount is final.

Utah's Children First Education Fund publishes the Carson Smith Opportunity homeschool amount two ways. Its award amounts page and its FAQ give a single $8,000. Its application guide gives $6,000 for K-6 and $8,000 for 7-12.

Missouri's Treasurer describes MOScholars as funded by contributions earning a state tax credit and does not mention an appropriation. The Cole County Circuit Court order in MNEA v. State records a $50 million general revenue appropriation into the same fund. Both can be true at once, and nothing Missouri publishes says whether they are.

Two accounts that exist and are not growing.

Both of these are real accounts a parent directs, and neither is making a new award for 2026-27. A company choosing where to put its effort wants the programs that are growing, so they are not in the twenty-four. They are here because the question comes up.

Montana, Special Needs Equal Opportunity Education Savings Account. For students with a disability, funded by a remittance from the school district's general fund. The Office of Public Instruction publishes no amount for 2026-27 and links only the 2025-26 table, which ran $5,186.06 to $8,584.79 by budget unit with ninety five percent deposited into the account. No 2026-27 application window has been published. The court stay that allowed the program to operate covered the 2025-26 fiscal year, and appeal DA 26-0179 is pending. EdChoice shows 75 participating students and a $6,602 average, both 2025-26. EdChoice still counts this program among its twenty-one.

Florida, New Worlds Scholarship Accounts. $1,200 a student, for tutoring, summer and after school programs built to improve reading or math, and instructional materials including computers, tablets, and curriculum. Step Up For Students states that for lack of new funding it is not accepting applications. Families with existing accounts may still spend their balances through the Education Market Assistant, and an account that shows no spending activity between July 1, 2026 and June 30, 2027 is closed and the money returns to the state. So it is a market this year with a deadline on it, and not one to build a footprint on.

Source: Office of Public Instruction education savings account page; OPI Student Amount table for SY2025-2026, June 5, 2025; MCA 20-7-1703(2) and 20-7-1709(4); EdChoice, Montana Special Needs Equal Opportunity ESA, last updated December 16, 2025; Step Up For Students, New Worlds Scholarship Accounts. Read October 1 to 4, 2026.

Seven programs people ask about.

Each of these comes up as an education savings account. None of them meets the test.

Nebraska. An education savings account program appeared in LB 1071 as introduced and in amendment AM2162. It is absent from the bill the Governor signed on April 7, 2026. Reporting from the Legislature puts its removal at second round reading in March 2026; the bill's own action history is the record for the exact stage. There is no Nebraska program.

The federal scholarship tax credit. Section 25F of the Internal Revenue Code, created by Section 70411 of Public Law 119-21, gives a taxpayer a credit for donating to a scholarship granting organization. It is not here because the federal statute creates no account for the student: it funds scholarship granting organizations through donor credits. The credit applies to taxable years ending after December 31, 2026, and calendar 2027 overlaps the back half of this school year, so the reason it is off this list is structural rather than a matter of timing. Thirty states have made an advance election to participate for 2027, on a list the IRS states is current as of September 14, 2026.

Oklahoma, Lindsey Nicole Henry Scholarship. The state issues a warrant that the parent endorses over to the private school. There is no account the parent directs, and no second category of expense.

Texas, Parent-Directed Special Education Services. A one-time grant of $1,500, set by rule, held in an online account a parent spends on approved goods and services for a student who stays enrolled in a public school. It meets more of the test than the rest of this list: it is parent directed and it covers more than one category. It is off the list because the grant is one time rather than a new award each year, which is the fourth condition.

Alaska, correspondence study allotments. A school district sets the allotment and approves each purchase, so the parent does not direct the account, and there is no statewide amount. One district publishes $2,600 for a full time K-12 student for 2026-27.

California, nonclassroom-based charter instructional funds. Funding goes to the charter school under its average daily attendance, and no statute creates an account for the student.

New Hampshire, Education Tax Credit Scholarship. A scholarship funded by donor credits, with no account language in the statute. RSA 77-G:2 I(b) sets $2,500 as the base cap on the average scholarship a scholarship organization may award and indexes it, so the figure in force for a given year is the adjusted one the Department of Revenue publishes rather than $2,500 flat.

Source: IRS, Federal Scholarship Tax Credit participating states, list current as of September 14, 2026, page reviewed September 16, 2026, read October 3, 2026; 26 U.S.C. 25F as created by Pub. L. 119-21 Sec. 70411; Unicameral Update, March 26, 2026, and LB 1071 as approved April 7, 2026; 19 TAC 102.1601(d)(1); OAC 210:15-13-7(e); AS 14.03.310 and the AKTEACH Handbook FY27, August 13, 2026; California Education Code 51747.3 and 47612.5; RSA 77-G:2 I(b). Read October 1 to 3, 2026.

How this page is kept.

Every figure on this page names the document it came from and the date it was read. A figure changes here when the state publishes a new one.

Independence and disclosures →

The list is public. The decision isn't.

Which of these states will repay the effort, what it takes to get paid in each one, and who is actually buying. Tell me what you sell and I will tell you where the money is.